In January 2022, the buyer purchased the steel plates from the Hongkong company, and paid the payment, but after the agreed date of delivery, the supplier did not prepare the cargo, and gave the excuse of higher price of raw material. So the buyer requested to terminate the contract and demand refund of deposit. But the supplier did not refund the deposit. The supplier was lost contacting. After we accepted the case, we filed the case in court by litigation, and claimed all refund and huge compensations. Although supplier is Hongkong company, we successfully found their business office and seized their properties in China mainland. In two months, the court judged the Hongkong company to refund payment and pay loses. And buyer received their refunds with compensations successfully. According to China litigation rule, if the business of supplier is in China, or the place of beneficiary bank is in China, or the place of delivery is in China, Chinese court has jurisdiction.
